Luméro Luméro
Nederlands

Free tool · NIS2 and ISO 27001

Is your organisation ready for NIS2 and ISO 27001?

Twenty questions in four steps, chosen from what the Dutch Cybersecurity Act (Cyberbeveiligingswet) and its decree require as a minimum. You do not get a grade but an order of work: what is missing, where to start, and which article and ISO 27001 control it rests on.

  • Your answers stay in your browser: nothing is sent or stored
  • Every question shows the article and the ISO 27001 control
  • Last checked against the sources:

Not sure yet whether the Act applies to you? Take the Cbw scope check first. If it does not apply, these are still the questions customers and ISO 27001 auditors will ask you.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Pick what fits best for each question. Yes: it is in place as described under 'Yes means', and you can show it. Partly: something is there, but not all of it; each question says what is then usually missing. If you cannot tell, choose 'Don't know': that is an outcome too.

Which sector are you in?

Does not count towards the outcome. It decides which additional rules you see.

Does the board demonstrably steer on information security?

The Act puts the responsibility with the board itself. These questions are about decisions, knowledge and oversight.

Has it been established whether the Cybersecurity Act applies to you?

Yes means: the outcome (essential, important or out of scope) is on paper with the reasoning, and if the Act applies, the organisation is in the national register and someone keeps the details current.

Partly means: it was looked into but not recorded, or the registration is still missing.

Basis: Cbw art. 44(1) · Cbb art. 27 · NIS2 art. 3(4) · ISO 27001: 4.2, A.5.31

Has the board approved the security measures?

Yes means: there is a board decision approving the measures, and the board discusses the risks and the progress at fixed moments.

Partly means: the board has been informed, but there is no recorded decision.

Basis: Cbw art. 24(1) · NIS2 art. 20(1) · ISO 27001: 5.1, 9.3

Has every board member followed a training on cyber risks?

Yes means: every board member holds a certificate of a training on risks, risk management and the ten areas of measures in the Act, and demonstrably keeps that knowledge up to date.

Partly means: part of the board is trained, or the training was followed without a certificate.

Basis: Cbw art. 24(2) · Cbw art. 24(3) · Cbw art. 24(5) · Cbb art. 21 · Cbb art. 22 · NIS2 art. 20(2) · ISO 27001: 7.2

Is it laid down who is responsible for information security?

Yes means: roles and authorities are on paper, one person is accountable (in-house or hired), has the time and the mandate and reports to the board, and whoever carries out the work does not check their own work.

Partly means: someone does it on the side, without a recorded mandate or without the time.

Basis: Cbb art. 6(2) · Cbb art. 14(1) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(i) · ISO 27001: 5.3, A.5.2

Is it independently tested whether the measures work?

Yes means: in the past year there was an internal audit or independent review, management assessed the results, and every improvement action has an owner and a date.

Partly means: it is looked at, but by the people who do the work themselves, or without a report and follow-up.

Basis: Cbw art. 21(3)(f) · Cbb art. 18 · Regeling EZK art. 3 · NIS2 art. 21(2)(f) · ISO 27001: 9.2, 9.3, 10.1

Do you know what you protect, against which risks, and who you depend on?

Everything else builds on this: measures have to fit your risks, and you have to be able to justify them.

Is there a current risk analysis? Key question

Yes means: the analysis is at most a year old, follows a fixed method with acceptance criteria, every risk has an owner and a treatment decision, and the board has accepted the risks that remain.

Partly means: there is an analysis, but it is more than a year old, has no owners or was never put to the board.

Basis: Cbw art. 21(3)(a) · Cbb art. 7 · NIS2 art. 21(2)(a) · ISO 27001: 6.1.2, 6.1.3, 8.2

Is there an adopted information security policy?

Yes means: the policy has been adopted by management, is on paper, says which parts of the organisation it covers, was reviewed in the past year, and staff know it and receive it when they start.

Partly means: there is a document, but it was never adopted, is outdated or is unknown to staff.

Basis: Cbw art. 21(3)(a) · Cbb art. 6(1) · Cbb art. 6(4) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(a) · ISO 27001: 5.2, A.5.1

Is there a current overview of all systems, data and cloud services?

Yes means: there is one inventory, every system has an owner and a classification, cloud services and production systems (OT) are in it too, systems the vendor no longer supports are flagged, and the list is updated with every change.

Partly means: there are lists, but scattered, incomplete or not maintained.

Basis: Cbw art. 21(3)(i) · Cbb art. 16(4) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(i) · ISO 27001: A.5.9, A.5.12

Have security requirements been agreed with your key suppliers?

Yes means: you know which suppliers are critical, the requirements are in the contract (including reporting incidents to you), and in the past year it was checked that they meet them.

Partly means: some contracts contain requirements, but it was never checked whether suppliers meet them.

Basis: Cbw art. 21(3)(d) · Cbb art. 10(2) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(d) · ISO 27001: A.5.19, A.5.20, A.5.22

Are the basic protections in place?

The measures that stop the most common attacks or keep them small.

Is multi-factor authentication (MFA) on for everyone who can sign in from outside? Key question

Yes means: MFA is enforced for every account that can sign in from outside (email, cloud, remote access) and for every administrator account, with no exceptions for directors, suppliers or legacy systems.

Partly means: MFA is on for most accounts, but there are exceptions or it is not enforced.

Basis: Cbw art. 21(3)(j) · Cbb art. 15(1) · Regeling EZK art. 6(2) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(j) · ISO 27001: A.8.5, A.5.17

Is access withdrawn as soon as someone leaves or changes role?

Yes means: access is requested and approved, ends on the last working day, administrators work with a separate account, and in the past year all rights were reviewed.

Partly means: accounts are usually closed, but without a fixed procedure or without a periodic review.

Basis: Cbw art. 21(3)(i) · Cbb art. 15(2) · Cbb art. 15(3) · Regeling EZK art. 6(2) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(i) · ISO 27001: A.5.15, A.5.18, A.8.2

Are critical security updates installed within a set time? Key question

Yes means: there are deadlines per severity level, with priority for everything that can be reached from the internet, a report shows whether they are met, and warnings (for example from the NCSC) are assessed and recorded.

Partly means: patching happens, but without a deadline, without an overview or not on all systems.

Basis: Cbw art. 21(3)(e) · Cbb art. 11(3) · Cbb art. 17(1) · Regeling EZK art. 5(2) · Regeling EZK art. 5(3) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(e) · ISO 27001: A.8.8, A.8.9

Is your network divided up, so that one infected workstation cannot reach everything?

Yes means: office, production (OT), backups and administration are separated from each other, only what was opened on purpose can be reached from outside, and suppliers only get in through controlled access with MFA.

Partly means: there is some separation, but production, backups or administration can still be reached from the office network.

Basis: Cbw art. 21(3)(g) · Cbb art. 7(5) · Cbb art. 11(3) · Regeling EZK art. 5(4) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(g) · ISO 27001: A.8.20, A.8.22, A.8.9

Are all laptops and phones encrypted?

Yes means: encryption is on for all laptops and phones, there is a policy that says what else you encrypt and how, and it is clear who manages the keys.

Partly means: most devices are encrypted, but not demonstrably all of them, or there is no written rule.

Basis: Cbw art. 21(3)(h) · Cbb art. 13 · NIS2 art. 21(2)(h) · ISO 27001: A.8.24

Do all employees get training in working securely?

Yes means: everyone, including directors and contractors, gets a training when they start and at least yearly after that, people know how to report something suspicious, and whoever has a security role gets training that fits it.

Partly means: there has been a training at some point, but not for everyone or not repeated.

Basis: Cbw art. 21(3)(g) · Cbb art. 12 · NIS2 art. 21(2)(g) · ISO 27001: 7.3, A.6.3

Can you notice, report and recover from an incident?

Something will go wrong one day. These questions decide whether that is an unpleasant week or a company crisis.

Is what happens in your systems monitored, so that a break-in gets noticed?

Yes means: sign-ins and administrator actions are logged, the logs are kept for a set period and protected against changes, detection runs on workstations and servers, and someone responds to alerts, also outside office hours.

Partly means: things are logged, but nobody looks at it, or only for part of the systems.

Basis: Cbw art. 21(3)(b) · Cbb art. 8(3) · Cbb art. 8(6) · Regeling EZK art. 5(3) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(b) · ISO 27001: A.8.15, A.8.16, A.8.7

Is there an incident procedure that says who decides and who does what?

Yes means: the procedure is on paper, can be reached when the systems are down, lists names and phone numbers, and was exercised or used in the past year and updated afterwards.

Partly means: people roughly know what to do, but it is not on paper or was never exercised.

Basis: Cbw art. 21(3)(b) · Cbb art. 8(2) · Cbb art. 8(4) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(b) · ISO 27001: A.5.24, A.5.26, A.5.27

Can you report a significant incident within 24 hours? Key question

Yes means: it is laid down when an incident is significant for your sector, who assesses that, who makes the report and where, and who informs customers; this also works at night and at the weekend. The follow-up steps (notification within 72 hours, final report within one month) are in the procedure.

Partly means: the duty is known, but who reports, where, and when an incident is significant is not laid down.

Basis: Cbw art. 26(1) · Cbw art. 27(1) · Cbw art. 29(1) · Cbw art. 30(1) · Cbb art. 24 · NIS2 art. 23(4) · ISO 27001: A.5.5, A.5.26

Can you restore your critical systems from a backup an attacker cannot reach? Key question

Yes means: there is a backup of all critical systems and data, at least one copy is offline or cannot be changed, and in the past year a full restore test succeeded, with a measured recovery time.

Partly means: there are backups, but a full restore was never tested or all copies can be reached from the network.

Basis: Cbw art. 21(3)(c) · Cbb art. 9(2) · Regeling EZK art. 4(1) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(c) · ISO 27001: A.8.13

Is there a plan for when your systems are down for a longer time?

Yes means: there are a continuity plan, a recovery plan and a crisis plan on paper, they say which processes must come back first and how you communicate when email and telephony are down, and they were exercised in the past year.

Partly means: there is a plan, but it is incomplete or was never exercised.

Basis: Cbw art. 21(3)(c) · Cbb art. 9(3) · Cbb art. 9(5) · Regeling EZK art. 4(2) · NIS2 art. 21(2)(c) · ISO 27001: A.5.29, A.5.30

Back (cancel)

Why these questions about NIS2 and ISO 27001?

The questions were chosen on three grounds: what the law requires as a minimum, what an ISO 27001 auditor looks at, and what is most often missing when incidents happen.

  1. The law as the floor. Article 21(3) of the Cyberbeveiligingswet, the Dutch act that implements NIS2, lists ten areas in which you must take measures. The Cyberbeveiligingsbesluit works these out in its articles 6 to 18, nearly always with the same three tests: laid down in writing, demonstrably applied and periodically tested. Each of those ten areas and each of those articles comes back in at least one question.
  2. The board and the clock. Article 24 puts approval of the measures and a training with a certificate with the board. Articles 25 to 29 set the deadlines for reporting a significant incident: an early warning within 24 hours, a notification within 72 hours and a final report within one month. Registration in the national register has been mandatory since 15 August 2026.
  3. The same answers for ISO 27001. Every question names the clause or control of ISO/IEC 27001:2022 an auditor would look at. The standard covers most of the duty of care, but not all of it: registration, the reporting deadlines and the board certificate are not in it. The Dutch supervisor RDI puts it plainly: meeting a standard does not mean you meet the duty of care. It does give you something to hold on to.
  4. Five key questions. The risk analysis, updates, MFA, backups and incident reporting are marked as key questions. A 'no' there cannot be offset by anything else: they concern the two most used ways in for attackers, recovery after ransomware, a statutory clock and the justification for everything else. Registration and board approval are just as mandatory and therefore come right after them, but are deliberately not key questions: a form or a signature closes them without making you any safer. The choice is a reasoned judgment, not a measurement.

What this check does not do

  • It verifies nothing. The outcome is as good as your answers. Research among security professionals (Schmitz et al., Computers & Security, 2021) shows that even experienced people often misjudge the level of measures. That is why 'yes' asks for evidence here and why there is a 'partly'.
  • 'In the past year' is my yardstick. The law sets no fixed intervals: you decide and justify yourself what 'periodically' means for your risks.
  • Sector rules go further. The references to the Regeling cyberbeveiliging EZK apply to manufacturing and the other sectors in article 2 of that regulation. In healthcare and for manufacturers of medical devices, measures must demonstrably meet NEN 7510, or ISO 27001 and 27002, or an equivalent level. For providers of digital services, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 applies instead of articles 6 to 18 of the decree.
  • The question set is public. The source gives the basis of every question and shows how the outcome is reached.